Software Myths
Introduction
In software development, dedication and understanding are essential for developers. However, during the development process, certain problems arise due to software myths. A myth means a false belief or misunderstanding — something that people assume to be true without evidence.
These myths lead to confusion and mistakes, slowing down the development process and affecting the quality of the final software. Software myths are common false assumptions held by managers, users, or developers, which are different from the actual reality of software engineering.
Understanding these myths and comparing them with the real truth helps in building better quality software, within budget and time.
Types of Software Myths
Software myths are generally divided into three categories:
-
Management Myths
-
User Myths
-
Developer Myths
1. Management Myths
These are the myths believed by project managers responsible for planning, budgeting, and delivering the software. They often come under pressure due to time, cost, and quality demands.
a) Complete Information Myth
Myth: Managers believe that developers must have complete information about the project, which can be found in manuals containing software procedures, principles, and standards.
Reality: In reality, software can be developed even with partial information. Manuals often become outdated over time. Developers rarely rely on manuals, and depending on them may delay the delivery process.
b) Scheduling Myth
Myth: Managers think that adding more developers will speed up the project if it’s running late.
Reality: This is false because new developers, especially freshers, need time to understand the system, which may cause more delays instead of reducing them.
c) Outsourcing Myth
Myth: Once the project is outsourced to a third party, the manager’s job is done.
Reality: Even after outsourcing, the manager must monitor the work. If the outsourced team does poor work, it may cause internal problems and long-term damage to the organization.
2. User Myths
These myths are believed by the end-users or clients who will use the software. Many users have false beliefs because developers or managers fail to explain things clearly to them.
a) Requirement Myth
Myth: Users think it’s enough to give a few basic requirements at the beginning and share the rest later.
Reality: In truth, complete requirements should be provided at the beginning. Late changes increase cost, time, and resource usage.
b) Software Flexibility Myth
Myth: Users believe that once the software is developed, it cannot be changed later.
Reality: Software is flexible and can be changed, updated, or improved in the future based on need and technology changes.
3. Developer Myths
These myths are common among software developers, based on their assumptions or misunderstandings about the development process.
a) Software Delivery Myth
Myth: Developers believe that once the coding is done and the software is delivered, their job is complete.
Reality: A developer’s role continues even after delivery. They are responsible for maintenance and updates as well.
b) Project Quality Myth
Myth: If high-quality tools or products are used, the software will also be of high quality.
Reality: Software quality doesn’t depend only on tools. It requires deep understanding, focus, and effort from the developer.
c) Documentation Myth
Myth: Developers think writing Software Requirement Specifications (SRS) is unnecessary and slows down the process.
Reality: Proper documentation improves software quality, and helps during maintenance, testing, and future development.